11:53PM - 14.04.'15
|
News Source: autoblog.com
|
There are two ways to approach a brand-new segment in the auto industry. First, an automaker can take a gamble and introduce a completely new vehicle, catering to the specific demands of the marketplace(s) in question. In the compact, premium CUV segment, we've seen Buick do this with the Encore, and Mercedes-Benz with the GLA-Class. The other option is to introduce a vehicle already sold in another market. Considering the amount of time it takes to bring a new vehicle from paper to production, there is plenty to gain in the short-term with this approach. It's not without its downsides, though, as we found after a week behind the wheel of the 2015 Audi Q3, a vehicle that was initially launched in 2011. Cute though it may be – it was referred to at least once by a passerby during our testing as "totes adorbs" – Ingolstadt's decision to introduce a vehicle that's already been on sale for four years, and is effectively approaching the last half of its lifecycle, leaves the Q3 at a significant disadvantage relative to the newer competition. Despite crossing its first auto show stage four years ago, the Q3 remains a handsome little bugger. Audi's designs, while conservative, tend to age very well, and the compact Q3 is no exception. It's like a scaled-down Q5 in most respects, although certain design pieces, like its more aggressively raked rear window and shorter front and rear overhangs, belie the significantly smaller Q3's figure. Due to its age, the Q3 was, fortunately, designed before the current A3 hit the market. That means it avoids the unattractive, minimalist dash of the A3, opting for a more traditional Audi design, with a strip of brushed aluminum on the passenger's side, a user-friendly center stack and a suitably large nav screen front and center. While the overall layout is attractive, the material quality is not what we'd expect of a newer Audi. There's nothing that feels exceedingly cheap – the plastics just feel old and too familiar. It's difficult to describe, but as soon as you climb in the Q3, things like the switchgear for the HVAC controls immediately remind you that this is a vehicle that's been on sale since 2011. While our definition of interior quality has evolved over the years, our idea of a driver-friendly cabin has not. The Q3 scores highly in this regard, featuring the elevated seating position that makes CUVs so popular with the general public. The seats are power-adjustable 12 ways, and the tilt/telescopic steering wheel has a huge range of adjustments. Our tester was fitted with the standard seats, rather than the optional thrones found in the $550 Sport Pack, although they still proved comfortable and supportive during our stint behind the wheel. Despite the compact rear window, visibility is excellent to the rear. It's no surprise, either, that sight lines are good forward and laterally. The diameter of the four-spoke, leather-wrapped steering wheel felt a bit on the large side, considering the size of the Q3 – somehow, we imagine such a tiny crossover with a more aggressive, smaller-diameter wheel. While the Q3 shows its age in the cabin, nowhere is its 2011 heritage more evident than its powertrain. A 2.0-liter, turbocharged four-cylinder has been paired with a six-speed automatic transmission, and Audi engineers left the nearly 3,700-pound Q3 with just 200 horsepower and 207 pound-feet of torque. Simply put, it's not enough. The Q3's rivals, most of which are powered by some form of 2.0-liter turbo, easily outpace our little, black jellybean. The BMW X1 xDrive28i, which has been on sale since way back in 2009 (in other markets, anyway), has 240 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque mated to ZF's eight-speed automatic transmission. The Mercedes GLA250 and its 2.0-liter turbo and seven-speed dual-clutch gearbox only slightly best the Audi on horsepower, with 208 ponies, but Stuttgart makes up for this shortcoming with 258 lb-ft of torque. Even the Lexus NX 200t, using the brand's first production turbocharged engine, manages to outdo the Q3, with 235 hp and 258 lb-ft of torque. It doesn't take a mathematician to figure out where the Q3 would end up in a drag race. The X1, which is roughly equal in weight, has a manufacturer-estimated sprint to 60 of just 6.3 seconds. Mercedes hasn't published an official time, but in our original test, we estimated that 60 would arrive in about seven seconds, which matches the time for the NX 200t. Despite being lighter than everything but the featherweight, sub-3,500-pound Mercedes, the Q3's manufacturer-estimated 8.2 seconds is just too slow. Since life doesn't take place stoplight to stoplight, though, there's more to the Q3 than it's lackluster numbers would indicate. Like the rival 2.0-liters, the Q3's torque is spread lavishly throughout the rev range, with peak twist available between 1,700 and 5,000 rpm. We found the real-world application of the 2.0T's grunt to be more impressive than its 8.2-second sprint time would indicate. We could almost forgive the Q3's weak power output if it were extremely thrifty, but with EPA-estimated fuel economy of 20 miles per gallon in the city and 28 mpg on the highway, the powertrain falls even further behind the competition. The most powerful vehicle in the segment (aside from the unnecessary GLA45 AMG), the X1, nets 22 city and 32 highway. The NX ties the Q3's highway figure but offers an extra two mpg in the city, while the GLA250 returns 25 city and 35 highway. Our experience with the Q3 was slightly better than the 23-mpg EPA estimate average, with the computer displaying around 25 mpg following our testing. The frustrating thing about this powertrain is that it could have been a lot better. Audi sells the Q3 in Europe with an S-Tronic dual-clutch transmission, which we're betting improves performance in both a straight line and at the pump. Our logic says North America's low-$30,000 price point demanded the less pricey automatic transmission. |
